AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Oovoo user search8/23/2023 On July 12, 2017, both cases were transferred. 1514 (2017), all parties agreed to transfer the lawsuits to the Northern District of California. After the Supreme Court’s opinion in TC Heartland LLC v. ooVoo and IAC each moved to dismiss their respective actions for improper venue. (“IAC”), also in the Eastern District of Texas. About a month later, MyMail asserted its patents against IAC Search & Media, Inc. On November 18, 2016, MyMail filed suit against ooVoo, LLC (“ooVoo”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas for infringement of the MyMail patents. Because we determine that the district court erred by declining to resolve the parties’ claim construction dispute before adjudging patent eligibility, we vacate and remand. appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granting ooVoo, LLC’s and IAC Search & Media, Inc.’s motions for judgment on the pleadings. Opinion dissenting filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. OOVOO, LLC 2 Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge REYNA. _ Before LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges. CY WALKER KEVIN PATRICK FLYNN, Cincinnati, OH JARED A. ROBERT LOUIS HAILS, JR., Baker & Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by BLAKE WILLIAM BUETHER. ![]() _ Decided: Aug_ ERIC WILLIAM BUETHER, Buether Joe & Carpenter LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. OOVOO, LLC, IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., Defendants-Appellees _ 2018-1758, 2018-1759 _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Nos. ![]() United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ MYMAIL, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |